A. The relationship between the parties, etc. 1) Plaintiff A is an urban bus vehicle No. 314 owned by E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) The Defendant is a mutual aider who entered into an automobile mutual aid agreement with the Defendant as a mutual aid vehicle and takes over liability for damages incurred in the course of the possession, use, and management of the Defendant vehicle.

B. At around 19:22 on September 22, 2017, D: (a) while driving the Defendant’s vehicle on the road adjacent to the Taedong-gu G in the vicinity of the Heaung-gu G from the area of the Hea Hospital to the intersection of the village; (b) at the crosswalk without any electric signal apparatus, the Plaintiff discovered a person who was left the right side of the crosswalk at the right side in the right side of the crosswalk and carried out a sudden operation; (c) at the time the Plaintiff was on board the Defendant’s vehicle, and was on the left side; and (d) the Plaintiff was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time, and was on the part of the passenger, the knifed hand installed in the vertical line with the hand hand; and (d) the Defendant’s vehicle was on the part of the bus knife with the knife with the knife knif.

(3) The Plaintiff suffered injury due to the instant accident (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s alley of pressure, etc. Nos. 1 through 3, Gap’s evidence Nos. 9-4, 5, 8, 11, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. As seen earlier, as seen earlier, there was a crosswalk installed at the front of the instant accident site, without any signal apparatus. As such, D, engaged in driving of urban buses, has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely proceeding with checking whether there is a pedestrian who gets a pedestrian by reducing speed and driving on the front door and right door and right door.

Nevertheless, it is not possible.