1. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant assaulted twice the victim’s head on the ground that the victim D(63 tax) was laid off on the back of the Defendant’s house at around 17:30 on January 21, 2016.

2. At the time, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) taken the face of the Victim E (V, 63 years old); (b) one-time, taken the face of the Victim E (V), who is the denial of C for the foregoing reasons; and (c) took an injection of the above gring, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment; and (d) took part in the examination of the lower part.

3. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant drafted a false complaint against D at the Defendant’s house located in the Northbuk-gunF.

The gist of the complaint is that "When the defendant D, who is the defendant, her head, her head, her head, was rented five times, he/she would be punished by the shock, so he/she would be punished by the shock." However, D did not have a fact that he/she was drinking the defendant.

Nevertheless, on March 2, 2016, the defendant submitted a written complaint to the police officer at the Gyang Police Station located in the Ganyangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun.

In this respect, the defendant made D's accusation for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant in part of the court room, 1 witness G, E, D, and H;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect to the prosecution (including the parts written in D and E);

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Complaints of the accused;

1. Domestic investigation reports, internal investigation reports (verification of the degree of injury), investigation reports ( telephone conversations with intent to issue a written diagnosis of injury), (the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not commit the crime of assault and bodily injury since the defendant did not commit the crime of assault and bodily injury since he/she did not commit the crime of assault and bodily injury since the defendant did not commit the crime of assault and bodily injury against the victim D

The argument is asserted.

(b).