beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.03.20 2017고단1072

주거침입등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On February 3, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a property damage, etc. on February 3, 2010; on August 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months; on January 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 6 million by the Changwon District Court for the crime of injury; on June 1, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million as a property damage; on September 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 50,000 as a property damage by the said court; on September 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine of KRW 26,000,000 as a property damage by the said court; on September 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 26.

[Criminal facts]

1. Intrusion upon residence;

A. On September 7, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at around 20:10, Sept. 7, 2017, at around around 20:10, around September 2017, at around 20:10, at the house of the victim D, a victim D, who remains in the victim’s house, destroyed the Defendant’s house by drinking the door door door door in order to visit the Defendant’s living together with the Defendant, who remains in the victim’s house, and the sound invaded the victim’s house through the door against the victim’s will in order to verify the situation.

B. On September 7, 2017, around September 23:3:30, the Defendant intruded into the above and went out of the victim’s restraint, and on the same day, the Defendant thought that he had been living together again in the said house at around 23:30 on the same day, and infringed upon the door up to the door that he remains.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the victim's residence more than twice.

2. On the same day, the Defendant damaged the victim’s unclaimed glass (60cm in width, 41cm in length, 0.3cm in thickness) at the market price owned by the victim, as set forth in paragraph 1(a) of the same day, by drinking it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;