On August 28, 2018, at least 12:47:12:47, the Defendant: (a) received a letter-to-face talker’s name-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement (E), F, andG) from the name-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement at a specific place; (b) received a personal signature from the Financial Services Commission documents; and (c) received a statement from a money exchange center to pay 3% of the money to another person as allowances; and (d) agreed to pay the money to the money to the money exchange-to-face name-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement-to-face statement; and (d) the Defendant directly collected the money from other employees of the fund exchange to the account.

On September 13, 2018, at around 10:34, 2018, a member in charge of the scaming on his name made a false statement to the victim H that “The Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office I.I. prosecutor. I. prosecutor. I. I., in the name of the party, was used for a crime. In order to prove whether a person is a perpetrator or a victim, he/she shall prepare a document with the prosecutor’s office, and in order to prepare it, he/she may withdraw money from the money in the party’s account to the Financial Supervisory Service, and leave him/her to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

In fact, however, there was no intention or ability to return money from the victim because there was no illegal use of the bank account in the name of the victim.

The above-mentioned officials shall be as such.