상해
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant: (a) prevented the victim from suffering from a defect that the victim intends to go to F; (b) laid the victim’s arms while putting the victim’s arms in order to prevent such defect; and (c) went back to the center while the victim under the influence of alcohol lost the center of the victim’s arms in order to ppuri the Defendant’s arms; and (d) there was no fact that the Defendant was faced with the face of the victim and
Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous by mistake.
2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the following facts can be acknowledged.
After the occurrence of the instant case, the victim submitted a written complaint to the police on the same day, and consistently from the investigation stage to the court below, the defendant suffered bodily injury since he/she got out of the face of the victim and pushed the chest.
statement is made.
On February 11, 2016, the victim received a diagnosis of injury after visiting a dental clinic on the next day, and receiving a diagnosis of injury. The part and degree of the injury specified in each injury diagnosis document are consistent with the cause and part of the injury claimed by the victim.
The victim was cut up to the right side of the upper part, and there was a hole on the upper part of the upper part of the upper part and the upper part of the upper part of the upper part, which cannot be deemed to have occurred beyond the upper part of the pool.
The witness G’s legal statement in the lower court also conforms to the victim’s statement (at the time of telephone conversation with the police at the request of the Defendant, the witness L), the Defendant’s body was sealed by his hand, and the victim was immediately exceeded.
The statement appears to have been made by the defendant in the court of the first instance, and even in the court of the first instance, the defendant pushed the victim.
In light of the above facts, the defendant made a statement in his/her hand that he/she sustained the victim's face and pushed his/her chest, thereby causing injury to him/her.
It can be sufficiently recognized, and the evidence requested by the defendant alone is insufficient to reverse the above judgment.
Therefore, it is true.