If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 14, 2013, at around 05:40 on September 14, 2013, the Defendant, at the front of the D convenience point in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Seoul, brought a dispute with the taxi engineer on his name, and the taxi engineer left the taxi on the road with the handbag of the Defendant.

Although a slope F, who patroled the place at the time, discovered the above handbag and had the handbag to the defendant, the defendant took a bath to the above F on the ground that he did not resolve the trial expenses with the taxi engineer, and the defendant took a bath to the above F on the ground that he did not resolve the trial expenses with the taxi engineer, and used the f on the f on the f on the ground that the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the f on the hand

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;