However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is a person who engages in labor.

1. On March 2, 2012, the third party office located in Jung-gu, Busan, a law firm established in Jung-gu, Busan. On March 2, 2012, the forgery of private documents: (a) the fact, despite the fact that there was no consent from F, the Defendant’s partner, on the Defendant’s debt of KRW 7 million, to make a joint and several surety in his/her name; (b) the Defendant, without authority, performed as if he/she was the F, for the purpose of exercising his/her rights and obligations; and (c) the Defendant, without authority, entered the name “F” in the signature column, a joint and several surety of “notarial money loan contract for security” in the name of F, a private document on the rights and obligations; and (d) forged a non-money loan agreement in the name of F, a private document on the rights and obligations.

2. At the same time, at the same place as before the uttering of the said investigation document, G, an attorney-at-law in charge of authentication, who did not know of the fact that a notarial deed for money consumption loan contract in the FF under the above forged name, submitted it as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Copy of notarial deed of money loan contract for transfer security, copy of F resident registration certificate, and application of delegation Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (the fact that there is no previous conviction or more than a stay of execution, and reflect).