However, with respect to Defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from January 2019 to March 18, 2019, “2006,” received a proposal from an employee of Bohishing in the name of the Defendant to withdraw the money deposited in the account under the name of the Defendant from cash, and then received a proposal from the employee of Bohishing in the name of the Defendant, and notified three account numbers including C (D) in the name of the Defendant to the above party in the name, and delivered the money deposited in each account to the above party in the name of the Defendant. On February 2019, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the remitter committed the crime of fraud by finding out the details of the remittance by stating “Fraud” and “a criminal charge by the above party in the process of arranging his account.”

On March 18, 2019, 201, the official in charge of the use of the Kakao Kakaothing to the victim E using the victim E in a non-place on the false statement that “the victim must transfer 6 million won within the kind of friendly test as it is possible to make a transfer instead of her body, and the victim has been transferred to the third account (D) in the name of the defendant.”

Since then, while recognizing that the Defendant committed the crime of fraud as above, the Defendant was subject to the control of the bank employees suspected of committing the crime of fraud after withdrawing 6 million won deposited in C (D) account under the name of the Defendant according to the direction of the person who was unable to receive his name.

As a result, the defendant aided and abetted the crime of fraud of a person who has not received a name.

【2019 Highest 4070” (hereinafter referred to as “criminal conduct”) is between the parties living together with the F building G of Gwangju Northern District. While Defendant B was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive the said person, the Defendants are informed of whether there was another account to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive money from the person who was unable to receive the money from