However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 1, 2019, around 22:45, the Defendant, at the front of Seocheon-si B, did not pay the taxi after using the taxi, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported report case by having been solicited by D to “to pay a taxi fee and return home” from the head of the police station belonging to the Busan High Police Station C District of the Busan High Police Station, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report by the taxi engineer, on one hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the district office and a copy of the public official identification card;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant recognized and reflected the crime. Although it appears to have committed a contingent crime while taking advantage of the crime, the police officer dispatched to him/her assaulted, and the police officer continued to take in his/her custody over to the earth.

The punishment shall be determined as per the disposition, in consideration of the fact that there is any past record of punishment by force.