When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 31, 2018, the Defendant had the products to be loaded on the cargo loaded on the cargo loaded on the cargo loaded on the truck at the C factory in the Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, and the victim D(52 years of age). However, the Defendant had the products to be loaded on the cargo.

In the event that a person engaged in driving for the fore to have a driver, he had a duty of care to take back the vehicle, to check whether there is another person on the route, and to prevent the collision accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant got back the said vehicle, and caused the collision with the left rear wheels of the said vehicle, where the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of care in the future, and the part of the victim's right to loaded the cargo onto the port side of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim during the above occupational negligence during approximately six weeks of treatment, with the right legle and pelpelle which require treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. In cases of investigation reports (in cases of attaching pictures, etc. of accidents), investigation reports (in cases of taking accidents), and the application of statutes;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, there is no power to be punished for the same kind of crime or to be punished heavier than the fine, and the fact that the decision to recommend reconciliation has become final and conclusive to pay seven million won of the indemnity amount