A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year and six months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

1. Defendant A, around October 24, 2013, 20: (a) around 20:00, along with E, a private village of Sejong Draw Stack 306; (b) When the victim B (the victim B) who passed the corridor was walking through the opening of the opening door, the Defendant continued to stop the victim B from the above studio corridor at several times due to drinking and launchings; (c) the victim F (the victim B) who was the wife of the victim B was removed from the new opening corridor; (d) the victim F (the victim F) who was the wife of the victim B was tight up to tight; (e) the victim was flick up with the wall of the victim’s head; and (e) the victim was flick up with the wall of the victim’s head; and (e) the victim’s head was flick.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim B, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment, such as the impairment of saved saves, and the victim F, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B divided the above injuries at the above date, time, and place. Defendant B had one kitchen knife (21cc in a knife length) which is a deadly weapon in the Defendant’s residence, and threatened the Defendant and A to the same end. Defendant B caused damage to the victim E (48 years old) by using a kitchen knife and causing about three weeks of treatment to the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ full or partial statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and A;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Determination as to Defendant B and defense counsel’s assertion of internal investigation report (Attachment of case scene, criminal tools, and photographs of the injured party)

1. The summary of the argument is that Defendant B assaulted the Defendant by removing the text of the receipt book and assaulted the Defendant by adding up to E. The mother and child used the Defendant's identification to ensure the safety of the Defendant's identification, and only threatened A and E with the knife with the knife to protect the Defendant's identification, and there was no intention to inflict injury on E, and E's active attack.