A. The facts of recognition (1) around 03:30 on November 19, 2013, B, the insured by the Defendant, driving a CModernccoror, and driving the national highway No. 17 at the entrance of the deculc Village in the Yellow-si in the Yellow-si, the national highway No. 17, at the end of the Yellow-si, was driven by approximately 70 km each other at a speed of 170 km between the two-lanes.

At the same time, the two sides of the road are bended to the right, and at the same time, the new wall time was cut down. However, B found the plaintiff who was walking along two lanes in the front side and proceeded as it was, and confirmed that the plaintiff was late, and continued to go back to the ground as the part of the Tracter because the measure was insufficient, and continued to go beyond the ground, and the part of the plaintiff's right side side of the Tracter with the rear wheel part of the Tracter.

(2) B, due to the above occupational negligence, committed an injury to the Plaintiff, such as an unfashing sofacing sofacing sofacing to the right end, and a pressure harming the right right, but failed to stop immediately and escape without taking measures such as aiding the Plaintiff.

(3) The Plaintiff was suffering from dementia at the time of the instant accident, and the knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne-kne kne kne-kne kne kne kne-kne kne kne kne-kne kne kne kin

B. According to the above facts of recognition, driving service B neglected his duty of care to safely drive the entire course and the left and right by reducing the speed in advance, and caused the instant accident. Thus, the Defendant is the insurer B, and the Defendant is the insurer of this case.