특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession and reflects all of the offenses from the lower court, the price of the thief crime of this case is relatively small and the damaged goods have been seized, and the public performance and obscenity crime was committed under the influence of alcohol.
On the other hand, even though the defendant had five times the past records of punishment for the larceny crime, he/she committed the larceny crime in this case at least 14 months after the completion of the execution of the final punishment, and in particular, it appears that he/she had little awareness of the crime, such as continuing to drink alcoholic beverages to the place where he/she had originally performed after the larceny crime. Meanwhile, even though he/she had the past record of punishment for the public performance and obscenity crime, he/she committed the crime of obscenity in this case. Furthermore, even if he/she had been punished for the public performance and obscenity crime, he/she appears to have committed the crime of obscenity in this case, and it appears that the method of committing the crime is close to the indecent act, such as the expression
그 밖에 피고인의 연령, 전과, 성행, 환경, 가족관계, 범행의 동기와 경위, 범행 후의 정황 등 여러 가지 양형의 조건들과 대법원 양형위원회의 양형기준에 따른 권고형량 범위◇법률상 처단형의 범위 : 징역 3년 - 25년 ◇양형기준의 적용 : 특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)죄는 양형기준이 설정되지 아니한 공연음란죄와 경합범의 관계에 있으므로 형량범위의 하한만을 고려함 [유형의 결정] 상습ㆍ누범절도 > 제1유형(일반상습ㆍ누범절도) [권고영역의 결정] 기본영역 [권고형의 범위] 징역 3년 - 6년(특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률 제5조의4 제6항에 해당하는 경우) 를 종합하면, 원심이 피고인에 대하여 선고한 형이 너무 무거워서 부당하다고 보이지 아니하므로, 피고인의...