1. Around 14:00 on August 18, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim D by stating that “C and D are replaced by fraud” in order to enable C and residents to listen to the building B before the front door of 307 of the building B at the Government-si.

2. On August 18, 2014, around 14:30 on August 18, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim D by stating that “C and D are replaced by fraud” so that C and residents may hear before the management office of the building B at Speaker.

3. On November 27, 2014, the Defendant, at the third floor of the auction system of the government court at the time of the Government, insulting the victim D openly by stating, “C and D are replaced by the fraud,” so that the competent official in charge of the court auction and the public auction personnel of the court may hear the names of interested parties. This two are replaced by a fake fraud.”

Judgment

The offense of insult is a crime subject to victim's complaint (Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act), and according to the written agreement, the victim can recognize the fact that the complaint against the defendant was cancelled on June 15, 2015, after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.