2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below and the trial court, in particular the victim E investigation agency and the consistent statement of damage in the court below, the defendant can be recognized as having inflicted an injury on the victim by walking the victim's bridge beyond the floor and destroying the victim's bridge as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below. Thus, the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.