2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected his mistake, and that the defendant deposited 2.4.8 million won to the victim F with the victim's money to be acquired in the first instance.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime three times, and repeated crimes of the same water law even while he lives for escape with multiple times, the fact that the amount acquired by the defendant from the victims exceeds 10 million won in total, and that most of the amount obtained by the victim is deemed to have not been recovered from damage to the other victims who have taken part of the amount obtained by the defrauded is considered to be disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.