However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around C convenience stores located in Jinjin-si B on November 11, 2019. At the C convenience stores, the Defendant, upon the Defendant’s request of the president of the convenience store, sent a alinium cans by launching a alinium cans, and (b) when the president of the convenience store finds the convenience store back to alinium cans by using a car, the Defendant sustained the injury of a alinium with a view to leaving the alinium room, which is a dangerous object under the pretext of harming the victim by approaching the car, and driving the alinium network, which is a dangerous object under the pretext of harming the victim, with approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. CCTV images;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is the victim's age, the father of the assaulted crime is the head head: Provided, That it appears that the defendant committed contingent crimes on the idea that he/she is the victim, the defendant's reflects the fact that he/she does not want the punishment, the defendant's primary offender, the defendant's environment, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered;