A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles (the part concerning the crime of embezzlement) and the defendant merely went to the passage between the victim and the product display stand, and there is no fact that the defendant's hand contacted the victim's her her son. Even if not, the defendant's hand her her her her her her her her her her her her her his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her.

B. In light of the misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles (A prosecutor 1) and the fact that the defendant has consistently made the victim's chest from the initial stage of the investigation that the victim's her chest, which can be presumed to have committed an indecent act twice or more, the victim's her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's