The execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 2, 2017, at around 00:30, the Defendant was unable to bring an disturbance for up to two hours, such as holding alcohol in E-cafeteria operated by D ( South, 37 years of age) located in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and holding D who entered the kitchen and work in the kitchen, with “human counseling defect”.

The Defendant interfered with this victim D's restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, which provides for the legal provisions on criminal facts;

1. Determination of a suspended sentence under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Recommendation type of sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to one year and six months;

2. Decision of punishment: to recognize errors;

There are records of crimes, such as fines 11, and there is also a little amount of punishment for obstructing duties.

Even before that, the defendant has re-expled similar behavior by finding the defendant.

The circumstances in which victims do not want punishment shall be taken into account.