beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.11 2016고단2202

특수협박등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, such as special intimidation, special property damage, and road traffic damage, was driving the front road of the middle school at the 303th parallel parallel of the Daegu-ro, Daegu-gu, the 303rd parallel of the 3rd parallel of the 1st parallel of the 3rd parallel of the 3rd parallel of the 3rd parallel, on the ground that he was living in the Defendant’s vehicle without using the direction for the DspP car of the victim C (W, 32 years old) driving, and was going back in the Defendant’s future without any justifiable reason while driving the 1st parallel of the 303rd parallel of the 303rd parallel of the 3rd parallel of the 3rd parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 1st parallel of the 2016.

As a result, the Defendant, which is a dangerous object, threatened the victim by driving the car at the same time, and at the same time, operated the car with the above SP to the extent that the repair cost is damaged to the extent of 649,603 won, such as replacement of the sP car at front of the repair cost, and operated the car without any justifiable reason by repeating the act such as a sudden operation and noise generation without justifiable grounds.

2. Where an owner of a motor vehicle in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act intends to conduct tubes for the items prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation of national land, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of

Nevertheless, on October 2015, the Defendant, at the F car center located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2015, installed the noise system for B rocketing cars owned by the Defendant without obtaining approval from the competent authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The application of investigation report (as regards the screen image analysis of the vehicles boomed), investigation report (as to the suspect A noise part photographic), investigation report (as to the suspect A noise part photographic), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the investigation report (as to photographic attachment

1. Articles 284, 283(1), 369(1), and 366 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts (a special intimidation), Articles 151-2 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act (a point where a person gets involved) of the said Act, the former Automobile Management Act (amended by Act No. 13686, Dec. 29, 2015).