beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.01.16 2013고정388

명예훼손

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The facts charged against the defendant of this case are as follows. A.

On September 201, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the victim’s reputation, who is the operator of the F Driving Schools, by openly pointing out false facts by openly making a false statement to the effect that “The F Driving Institutes (F Driving Schools) was illegally registered in the inside of the “D Driving Schools” located in Pyeongtaek-si C; and (b) the F Driving Institutes (F Driving Schools) did not immediately close the door, notwithstanding the fact that the “F Driving Schools (F Driving Schools)” was either unlawfully registered in the inside of the inside of the inside; and (c) “The F Driving Institutes was illegally registered in the inside of the inside of the outside of the inside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of the outside of

B. On November 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the effect that four persons, such as the president and I of the HHHA, were engaged in illegal transactions with the Office of Education; (b) distributed materials stating the purport of “The FHA would have caused illegal transactions with the Office of Education; and (c) damaged the honor of the victim G, who is the operator of the FFA, by openly pointing out false facts.

C. On May 2012, the Defendant sent to the K High School located in Pyeongtaek-si J in Pyeongtaek-si, and even if the “FFA” did not illegally obtain permission, the Defendant, despite the fact, sent documents containing the false statement that “FA is receiving a civil petition from the Board of Audit and Inspection due to illegal authorization, permission, and operation of a private teaching institute operated in the Juvenile Prohibited Area (HA).” The FAF will report the corruption of the office of education in newspapers and television news, thereby impairing the honor of the victim G, who is the operator of the FFA.

2. Determination:

A. On September 201, 201, the full-time statement on the part of defamation (the facts charged in the above paragraph (A) is inadmissible in principle pursuant to Article 310-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act. In accordance with Article 316(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the person making the original statement is unable to make a statement due to death, illness, residence abroad, or any other cause.