2. It is recognized that there is room for the judgment to take into account the fact that the defendant is economically in difficult circumstances and the circumstances leading up to the defendant's crime.

However, in light of the fact that damage recovery has not been performed, the defendant had the same criminal record, the sentence of the court below against the defendant seems to have been determined by fully taking into account the various circumstances mentioned above, and there are no changes in circumstances that may differ from the court below's original sentence, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, criminal record, circumstances after the crime, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., which are conditions for the argument and the sentencing indicated in the records of this case, it is not unreasonable that the court below's sentence is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.