손해배상(자) 청구의 소
1. The Defendant: (a) 397,124,707 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 392,374,707 won to Plaintiff B; and (c) 392,374,707 won to each of the said money. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23264, Jul. 26,
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) D around July 26, 2019:15, around July 23, 2019, 201: (a) C is a Coin or Bosch Rexroth Esi (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
) A driver of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant accident”) and entered the F apartment complex into the apartment complex, collision and continuous progress due to an unforeseen cause, and was placed in the front part of the vehicle and received from the outer wall of the building in the center for senior citizens (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) Around July 27, 2019, around 01:30, D died due to the damage to the blood drums of the body, the dysium dysium, etc. Around July 27, 2019, G, the passenger of the Defendant vehicle, died of brain dysium due to cerebral transfusion around 05:45 on July 27, 2019.
(hereinafter referred to as “W.” 3) The Plaintiffs are parents and successors of the Deceased, and the Defendant is a mutual aid project operator who has concluded a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant’s vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The Defendant is a mutual aid project operator who has concluded a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant’s vehicle. [This ground] fact that there is no dispute, the entries and videos (including the case where there is a serial number, hereinafter the same shall apply) in
- The purport of the whole pleadings
B. Since the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid business operator of the vehicle.
C. According to the description of No. 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the deceased did not wear safety belts at the time of the accident, and in light of the fact that the deceased died of brain as a cerebral side by his head, the circumstance where the deceased did not fasten safety belts was caused by the expansion of the deceased’s damage.
A driver who has worn a safety belt has died before the deceased due to an accident, but there is no evidence to deem that the body or degree of the accident shock caused by the deceased and the driver on the back seat of the steering team is the same. In light of the fact that the deceased died due to the damage to the dunese dystroke, dystroke, etc., and the cause of death differs from that of the deceased, even if the deceased was killed and the accident was caused, the result of the death shall be affected.