When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a Korean language teacher of the “D High School” in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and the victim E (the age of fifty-five) is a Korean history teacher of the above high school and the head of the first grade department.

The Defendant, on the grounds that the school newspaper he distributed to his students did not obtain the approval of the principal of the school, did not collect and bring it to the victim.

Accordingly, at around 12:50 on June 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 12:50, the third floor corridor of the above third floor of the school used by the victim for the purpose of cutting off the examination of the school, and (b) the victim was divided the chest of the victim in the process of cutting off the examination into a defective newspaper without putting the examination inside the goods, and caused injury such as the right side, the part, the part, etc. in need of treatment for about one week to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, E, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (excluding the part of investigation into witnesses No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant asserts that he denies the facts charged in this case since he did not have any physical contact with the victim, even though he did not fit for any contact with the victim.

2. We examine the following circumstances, i.e., the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court: ① the victim has only stated that he/she was damaged by the defendant in this court and, in particular, it seems difficult for the defendant to specifically memory his/her speech, behavior, surrounding circumstances, etc. at the time, and ② the credibility of his/her statement is found.