손해배상등
1. The appeal of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).
purport, purport, and.
1. The court of the first instance rejected the instant lawsuit without holding any pleadings, deeming that the instant lawsuit was unlawful and thus cannot be corrected for the following reasons.
Defendant G filed an application with the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) for the provision of security for litigation costs under this Court 2014Kadam1532, and on March 12, 2015, this Court rendered a decision ordering the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) to deposit security for litigation costs within 15 days from the date of receipt of notification of the decision. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) filed an appeal against the said decision under 2015Ra1007, but the appeal was dismissed on July 9, 2015, and the said decision became final and conclusive. This court ordered the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) to provide security for the remaining Defendants within 15 days from the date of receipt of notification of the order on April 9, 2015, the fact that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) failed to provide security within the above decision and order, is apparent or obvious. Moreover, the part of the instant lawsuit cannot be deemed as having been subject to the Plaintiff’s obligation to file a revised decision and its legal grounds for performance, which are similar to the Defendant’s obligation to file a claim, as well as the purport and its legal grounds for the claim.
2. According to the records of this case, the plaintiff (appointed) submitted a petition of appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance, but the defects such as the uncertainty of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim are still the same, as the judgment of the court of first instance properly states.