When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 13, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “C’s fishing signboard was removed and attached to D and used for navigation of the said D fishing vessel” to the slope E belonging to the said police station after receiving a request from B to the investigation and investigation department office of the Gun Coast Guard and the investigation department office of the Simsan-si, Simsan-si to the effect that the Defendant attached C’s fishing vessel signboard to D.”

Accordingly, the defendant, knowing that he committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment B, had the offender escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. One-time protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning G, H and I;

1. Investigation Report (A, F Investigation and Trial Records attached) and - Ship Inquirys, - Notarial photographs, copies of each protocol of suspect examination against A, protocol of trial, protocol of trial, judgment - Protocol of examination of witness against B, protocol of witness material description(B).

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a separate statement of statement attached);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant was found to have caused the instant crime by the B’s request, recognition of criminal facts and reflects the wrongness, the crime committed by the defendant also requires strict punishment because it is a serious crime that obstructs the state’s criminal justice activities such as investigation, trial, etc. by making it difficult to discover substantial truth, and the defendant was found guilty at the trial of the first instance court where the trial was proceeded with and the result that interfered with the criminal justice was actually generated.