전자금융거래법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The gist of the defendant's grounds for appeal was that the defendant had been suffering from disease, such as cryposis and cryposis, but it was necessary to install hospital expenses for the purpose of saving the gypble and removing the gypble, thereby resulting in the crime of this case. However, the sentence of the court below that sentenced the defendant a fine of KRW 3,00,000 is too unreasonable.
In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had been sentenced to suspension of indictment for the same crime as in the instant case even before committing the instant crime; and (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime at least twice during a short period; and (c) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, including the Defendant’s age and environment, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4,000,000 in total amount of the initial fine, but the lower court’s sentence that sentenced the Defendant to KRW 3,00,000 by reducing that sentence is appropriate and unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit.