상해
Defendant
B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
Defendant
B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000.
Defendant B, on April 9, 2015, was hospitalized by the Defendant’s mother G (83 years old) 55 of the 5-dong-dong F Hospital in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu around 19:20 on April 9, 2015, Defendant B, in the sick room where the Defendant’s mother G (83 years old) was hospitalized, Defendant B, as follows: (a) the female married couple, who was not good for peace, was in the sick hospital, “I would like to fluor anywhere the widths fluor anywhere.” (54 years old), and (b) was in the same room where the female married couple was fluorous, who was fluoring the Defendant, was fluorous to the victim A (54 years old), who was fluoring the fluoral, and (c) was fluoral fluoral fluord with the victim, requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Part of Defendant B’s legal statement
1. Each legal statement of a witness A and H;
1. Part of the police protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of the defendant B
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Parts of the offense under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (2016, 732) of the provisional payment order;
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A gathering the mother-friendly G (83 years of age) of the ordinary victim in the F hospital in Jung-gu, Daegu at around 19:20 on April 9, 2015, within the sick room of 5:6:55 of the F hospital in Jung-gu, Daegu at around 19:20, the victim and his female H are faced with a private case, and there is a complaint among family members.
As such, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, “Isle why it has been why you would have been distorted here,” such as salt, tension, etc. on the part of the horse, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by putting bombling in one hand due to a usual dissatisfaction.
2. Determination
A. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, each of the statements of B and I is difficult to believe, and the statement of injury diagnosis is insufficient to recognize the facts charged by itself, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
(1) B and Ha whose parents gather.