저작권법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. From July 2015 to May 4, 2016, the Defendant infringed upon the copyright of the victims by reproducing “Auto CAD 2014” without permission from “C”, which is a part of the management of the Defendant on the third or fifth floor in Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, and by using “Auto CAD 2016,” the copyright of which is owned by the victim Outa CAD 2014 without permission, as described in the attached list of crimes.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, which may be prosecuted only upon complaint under the main sentence of Article 140 of the same Act.
However, on November 9, 2016, the victims who filed the complaint of this case had cancelled the complaint against the defendant on the date of filing the prosecution of this case.
Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.