On August 25, 2015, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and three years of suspension of execution for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) in the Jinwon District Court's Jinju Branch branch on August 25,

9.2. The ruling becomes final and conclusive and conclusive and is seven times more violent crimes, including those during the period of suspension of execution.

around 00:20 on September 28, 2017, the Defendant received a demand from the Jinju-si Cel, and from the victim D (the age of 62) to change the smuggling, and made the victim her desire to do so. The Defendant depiced three chemical parts equivalent to the total market price of 90,000 won in the stairs display site on the second floor, and the Defendant used the victim to display the fire extinguisher at a level of 50,000 won at the market price after the victim’s escape. The Defendant used the victim to assault the victim who lided the head of the female.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the same criminal records and confirmation);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [Aggravation of concurrent crimes as stated in the holding of heavier concurrent crimes];

1. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Category 1 - The sentence of recommending the destruction of property: No person who is subject to special sentencing from April to October (basic areas):

(b) 2nd offence - The sentence of recommendations to make a width: there shall be no special sentencing factors from February to October (basic areas):

(c) Many crimes: April to March; and

2. The sentence of sentence is inevitable because the defendant, who has been sentenced to eight times the past records of violent crimes and four times the past records of interference with business, committed the instant crime again during the period of suspension of execution due to violent crimes.

However, it shall be considered in favor of the fact that the damage incurred by the instant case is not relatively serious.

In addition, the age, sex, environment, background, means and result of this case shall be committed.