beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.09.18 2015재고단30

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 10, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 7 million won by larceny, etc. at the Suwon District Court on July 21, 2009, to a fine of 2 million won by larceny, etc., and on July 21, 2009, at the Sungwon District Court, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, to a night building intrusion larceny, and on November 12, 2010, a fine of 3 million won from the Seoul East East District Court as larceny; on July 19, 2012, at the Sungwon District Court Sungnam Branch Branch Branch, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months as larceny and on November 29, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence at the same prison on May 26, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 03:30 on July 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that at the same time, the victim C, who was parked there, set a car door at a D. Dop, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 6,000,000, the victim C, who was parked there, set up at the same time, set up a car door and run a car driving the car at the speed of 124,00,000,000,000,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

2. On July 13, 2014, at around 18:50, the Defendant driven a vehicle with approximately KRW 7 km away from the insular area of the Pungdong-gu, Sungnam-si to the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, 72-gil 2 and the SKju Oil Station (Hadong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the power of each crime and the same kind of crime in the judgment;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 332, 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the driving under the influence of alcohol under Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;