When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BP car.

On June 14, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 08:00, and driven the front of the D road at the time of harmony C, one-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of the water source from the view of harmony.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a right to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to proceed at the same speed even if the signal is changed to the stop signal, and found the victim E (49) who cross the crosswalk from the left side to the right side in accordance with the pedestrian signals, delayed detection of the victim E (49). However, the Defendant operated the crosswalk to avoid this, but did not avoid it, and did not go to the lower part of the victim's passenger car, and got the victim's back to the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as pressing the left-hand body in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. A survey report on actual condition and an accident scene photograph;

1. Photographss of CCTVs for crime prevention, on-site CCTV CDs, and CCTV images taken;

1. Investigation report ( telephone conversations between harvested persons G);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Sentence, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Act was committed by the Defendant,