2. Although the Defendant appears to be against the recognition of the crime of this case, it appears that the victims' damage amount to KRW 1.20 million, repeated fraud against two victims by the same method, in light of the degree of deception, the crime was serious in light of the degree of deception, and the victim B prepared an agreement with the Defendant to believe that the Defendant would pay KRW 1.5 million to the victim B, but the Defendant did not pay any money to the victim B. The Defendant had the power of being sentenced to suspended execution due to the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, including the content of the crime by deceiving others at the time of the crime, and in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.