도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
The summary order subject to review and the summary of the facts charged by the summary order (former District Court's Eup branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's order is amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993 by Act No. 4548 of Jan. 5, 199, and the employee of the juristic person's representative's representative's office's representative's duty under Article 28 of the former Road (amended by Act No. 486 of Oct. 25, 2012) which is the law of the prosecution of this case's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's branch court's 1708 main office'.
“Determination that the part in the Criminal Procedure Act is unconstitutional. It is not guilty of the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.