beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.06.02 2015가단6351

물품대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As the cause of the instant claim, the Plaintiff entered into a contract between the Defendant and the Defendant on August 8, 2014 to install the tamp pumps s-4000 1, the rack air conditioning equipment for remaining sugar and hot water, the 1 set of wastewater heat collection equipment 1 set forth in the other pipes B on the well-ins of each other, and the remainder of the 60,000,000 won (excluding value-added tax), excluding the 2 set forth in the contract clause, and subsequently completed the operation at the time on the 19th day of the same month, and filed a claim with the Defendant for the payment of the above 60,00,000 won and the delay damages as stated in the purport of the claim.

The facts that the plaintiff set up the alleged product B in the mutual friendship, although there is no dispute between the parties, there is no evidence that the other party to whom the plaintiff entered into the above contract and set up the product, and the other party to whom the plaintiff supplied the product is the defendant as the defendant's individual. Rather, considering the overall purport of the pleadings in the items of Gap's Nos. 1, 3, 4, and Eul's No. 1, 3-3, and Eul's No. 9, the defendant can only recognize the fact that the defendant entered into a contract with the plaintiff as the representative director of Eul, who operates the mutual friendship, as alleged by the plaintiff, and set up and supplied the products of the plaintiff's

Therefore, the claim of this case based on the premise that the defendant is the counterpart to the plaintiff's assertion contract is without merit, and it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.