However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 19, 2017, the Defendant traded 11,000,000,000 won of used vehicle to the injured party C (83 tax and south) at the office located in the Seo-gu Incheon building B, Seo-gu, Incheon. However, the Defendant would bring 10,80,000 won of greenson’s part.

“False speech” was made.

However, the actual transaction price of used cars sold by the defendant was 4.3 million won, excluding the transfer cost of KRW 550,000,000.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 10,80,000 from the injured party as a used car selling price.

2. Any person who intends to conduct a motor vehicle management business shall register with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without registering the automobile management business, received cash 10,800,000 won from the victim C who was found Internet advertisement at the office located in the office located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon around April 19, 2017, and sold the DNA vehicle with the automobile management business without registration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A motor vehicle transfer certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (as to the confirmation of the actual purchase amount of a vehicle);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 79 Subparag. 13, Article 53(1) (the point of running a unregistered motor vehicle management business) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. In light of the number, circumstances, and attitudes of each of the crimes of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, it is not good for the defendant to be punished, and the defendant has the record of being punished for the crimes of the same and the same method.

Therefore, the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment.

However, the defendant recognizes all crimes and reflects them.