Plaintiff

At around 16:00 on August 27, 2017, A, P, Q, and R were in a fluoral end by the "T fluence store" located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and were in a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, and they were in a fluoral fluoral relationship with L, M, N,O, and were in a fluoral fluoral fluor.

On August 27, 2017, L, M, N,O, etc. and the performance of work including Plaintiff A, etc. moved in the future of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government U building parking lot around 16:50.

L, while assaulting R, assaulting the face of the plaintiff A, flaging the face of the plaintiff A by drinking it, selling the plaintiff's face to knee and knee and flag, and assaulting the plaintiff A's head debt by driving the plaintiff's head debt by hand and using the knee and flag, and assaulting the plaintiff A's head debt by drinking it to kne and drinking it.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant harmful act.” As a result, Plaintiff A suffered from injury, such as internal and brick strings, stokes, stokes, stokes (tokes, stokes, and stokes) and class II stokes (tokes) and stokes (tokes).

Plaintiff

A, L, M, N, andO were all students in 201 and were in high school at the time of the instant harmful act.

[Basis] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 7 evidence, Gap 1 to 1 evidence, Gap 10-1 to 4 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. 1) In a case where a minor is held liable for tort on his own due to the ability to assume responsibility, if there is a proximate causal relation with the minor’s breach of duty by the supervisor, the supervisor is liable for damages as a general tortfeasor (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 93Da60588, Aug. 23, 1994). As seen earlier, L, M, N, andO as a minor high school student at the time of the instant harmful act, each parent is the same as the Defendants.