On June 7, 2015, the Defendant was driving a bitex around 16:00, and came to enter the national highway No. 649, a single-lane 855-ro, Seosan-si, Seosan-si.

At the time, since the bicycle driven by the victim C is proceeding with the above national highways on the side of the tin, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by checking whether a person engaged in the business of operating the tea has a end-of-way and the right and the right, etc. of the said national highways after checking whether there is a end-of-way and the right and the right, etc. of the person engaged in the business of operating the tea, and then entering the said national highways, and making it prompt after entering the said national highways so as not to interfere with the end-of-way of the national highways.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not care well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the part of the above bicycle that the Defendant is driving with the front part of the same bicycle, which the Defendant is driving, by entering the vehicle line of the victim and stopping it.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim’s injury, such as cutting the frameworks of the franchisium, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the victim’s bicycle so that approximately KRW 97,000 of repair costs would be included.

Judgment

1. The defendant's arguments asserted that the defendant's main points of the accident of this case did not lead to the fault of the defendant as to the accident of this case, since C stopped at the edge of the road and stopped at the edge of the road by reporting that C was entering the national road by driving a Bosch Rexroth, and C stopped at the edge of the road.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records and arguments regarding the instant case, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor is alone.