beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.08 2015나71077

보증채무금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

A. Evidence No. 1 (Loan Guarantee Contract) and Evidence No. 3 (Loan Guarantee Contract), the Defendant recognized the authenticity of Evidence No. 1 and Evidence No. 3 at the date of the first instance trial, but, based on the last pleading as of November 3, 2015, which was stated at the date of the first instance trial, and the statement of grounds of appeal No. 1 and Evidence No. 3 were prepared by the coercion of employees belonging to the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund for the Fund.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.