The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

To the extent that it does not infringe the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged shall be revised and recognized.

Defendant

A, C, and B are South Korea.

Defendant

C reported the marriage to the deceased on June 12, 2017, who is the father of the victim D and the deceased on June 2017. As the deceased on June 20, 2017, there was a dispute over the inheritance of the deceased's property between the victim D and D.

Defendant

C, around June 29, 2017, at around 17:10 on June 29, 2017, Defendant A and B found the damage victim on the Nam-gu F and fourth floor of the building in the name of the deceased and demanded a dialogue with the victim in relation to the monthly rent of the building in the name of the deceased. However, the victim was waiting for about 20 minutes, and the victim did not appear for about 20 minutes later, and the hospital staff, including H, considered, “this son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son her father, and she cannot run the hospital business,” and “I expressed a high desire for 30 minutes more than 5 minutes more than 10 minutes more, such as “I am son son son son son son son her father son son son her son son her father her,” and “I son son son son son son .”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;