However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 27, 2010, the Defendant issued, at the Jeonju District Court, a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on July 29, 2013, a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court.

On December 13, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant driven a car with approximately KRW 100 malty B strawing in front of the world of the same city, from the street in front of the wave located in the Masi-dong in the next city of the Republic of Korea, to the front of the world electric power lighting in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry about the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Records before judgment: Application of criminal records, repeated statements, and copies of each summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (including the fact that a person has been punished several times for a person driving a motor vehicle, but all of the records of the punishment are punished for a person driving a motor vehicle, is punished by a fine, and that a person has committed a misunderstanding and has not driven a motor vehicle again);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary mitigation of these circumstances shall be taken into consideration);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;