beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.10.21 2019가단116354

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 25,000,000 with the Plaintiff as well as 5% per annum from September 27, 2019 to October 21, 2020.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of February 2018, the Plaintiff (2004 Students) was a second-year student in female and Defendant D (2002 Students) was a first-year student in a high school residing in Chungcheongbuk-ju at the time, and both the Plaintiff and the Defendant were aware through F’s Internet meeting (G).

Defendant E is his father who is responsible for fostering while living with Defendant D.

B. On February 24, 2018, the Plaintiff and Defendant D committed a prior promise to participate in a meeting of club members held in Seoul on the same day, and entered the studio in front of the HJ at only two thousand Y in Seoul around the same day, and the above Defendant committed sexual assault against the Plaintiff’s will (hereinafter “instant accident”). In the same day, the Plaintiff and Defendant D committed sexual assault against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant accident”).

On the same day, the Plaintiff attended the club immediately after the accident of this case, and returned home to the Plaintiff as the above Defendant, while going to Seoul Station on the same day.

C. The above defendant, after the accident of this case, is not suitable for the plaintiff.

Although there were letters, such as a pipe of a crime book, the Plaintiff was unable to answer the communication, such as letters, from the establishment column of the Kakakakao Kakao Kakao Maooo-gu to block the Plaintiff, and discarded the contact with the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff left away the contact with the Plaintiff. The Defendant, who saw the distance, puts up a dub in online hosting and puts a dub in a dub, and made a dub and negative remarks. However, the Defendant did not act differently, or did not directly contact the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the instant accident with the competent police station on April 16, 2018.

At the time, the plaintiff is asked to the investigator in charge of the victim questioning for the reasons reported after two months from the accident.