2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in light of the facts that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and committed it against the victim, the victims recovered part of the damage through civil litigation, etc., but the defendant committed the crime of this case even during the period of repeated crime of the same kind, the victims did not recover from actual damage, except for the part recovered through civil litigation, etc., the defendant did not cause serious damage to the victims of the crime of this case, and the victims wished to punish the victims, and the victims suffered severe damage systematically. In the case of the crime of this case, the crime is not committed, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and there is no change in the amount of money, character and conduct of the defendant, the motive and means of the crime of this case, the motive and consequences of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.