However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, along with the president E who operates the Daegu metropolitan-gu Daegu-gu Daegu-gu Office for the sale of secondhand crafts crafts, became aware of the victim F, who had been employed as an employee in his/her place of business.

After that, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol with the victim, was a member of lursung (the largest regional violence organization in Busan). When 18 slaughter, the Defendant returned to the prison for 5 years in relation to the case of the film “Maurdong” (a motion picture created by lursung’s staff on the basis of the actual case that murdered the behavior ledger in the new 20th century). After release, the Defendant took a large amount of money, and 10 million won, followed the Chairperson (G). After release, the Defendant 1 took a large amount of money, and 10 million won. The Defendant 1 took the following tasks: (a) frequently took the post-ray and the instant case-related talk; (b) had the victim aware of the organized violence; and (c) had the victim take frighten with the victim after being aware of the organized violence; and (d) had the victim take money under the pretext of the victim’s valuable business expenses

1. Marsh portion

A. On August 14:00, the Defendant purchased the “IWC” from the victim in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, at the request of the victim to take measures again. Although the Defendant received KRW 5,00,00 from the seller of the above visual items in Busan-gu, it was not returned to the victim despite having sold the said visual items, the victim, who became aware of the fact, did not return money to the victim. However, on the basis of the increase, the Defendant expressed a large amount of money, “IWC” as “IWC” and “IWC will be lurpath, so that I would have lurpath, so that I would have money,” and the victim would have expressed a attitude of causing harm to the victim’s body and property when the victim continues to demand a visual payment by making a heavy request.

Therefore, the defendant, by threatening the victim as above, has the victim take care of the claim of 5,00,000 won in sight.