A. At the time of August 20, 2012, the Defendant was the representative director of B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”), and C is the person who actually operated B as the internal director of B.

B. C intended to enter into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on automobiles at the City of Saturdays or 3.5.

C, upon request from the defendant, the inside director of B and the defendant-type D, received documents in the name of the defendant and documents in the name of B.

C. On August 20, 2012, the Defendant issued a certificate of personal seal impression B, B copy of the register, business registration certificate, Defendant’s certificate of personal seal impression, Defendant’s resident registration certificate, Defendant’s resident registration certificate, copy of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, B corporation design, Defendant’s seal impression (hereinafter “instant documents”). D.

C:

At this time, E and E, an employee of the salesroom, who representing the Plaintiff, entered into an automobile lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with E, an employee of the salesroom, 3.5, 3.5, 3.5, 450, 53, 214, 450, 53, 1,293, 100, monthly rent, 36 months, 36 months, and 25% per annum.

E. The Plaintiff, upon the delayed payment of the rent, terminated the instant lease agreement on February 14, 2013. On June 3, 2013, the Plaintiff has the obligation of KRW 43,021,324, interest for arrears of KRW 3,213,91, and interest for arrears of KRW 32,00 in total, KRW 46,267,315.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties concerned conferred the basic power of representation to C, and C concluded the lease contract in this case with the plaintiff based on such power of representation. The plaintiff has justifiable grounds to believe C to obtain legitimate power of representation from the defendant and enter into the lease contract in this case. Thus, the defendant is KRW 46,267,315 under the lease contract in this case.