Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that "A" was changed to "B" corporation (the corporate name of the corporation is changed to "D"; hereinafter "the company in the lawsuit")" in Section 11 of the second judgment of the court of first instance, and "A" in Chapter 17 of the second judgment is added to "B", and "B" and the non-party company operated by the defendant and the plaintiff and E enter into a partnership contract as alleged by the defendant on June 12, 2013 and distribute profits by selling the penine products," and "the company operated by the defendant" in Chapter 5 of the third judgment as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for changing "the company operated by the defendant to "the company in the lawsuit in the lawsuit in the court of first instance" to "the company in the lawsuit in the court of first instance". It is cited as it is as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.