except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 6, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) driving a motor vehicle in the B B B in the influence of alcohol (under blood alcohol concentration) on October 6, 2018, and led the front side of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to turn back to the left from the surface of the Yeongdeungpo-gu telephone station.

At all times, the driver of a motor vehicle with a intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the front door and the left and the right in a clean mind and driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult, such as moving off the vehicle without a clear distance and moving off the vehicle, due to the negligence in violation of the signal and driving the vehicle at the right edge by the victim E (the age of 51) driven by the right edge signal on the right edge of the vehicle operated by the Defendant, the front part of the FK5-si driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant driven the said car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, and suffered injury such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires treatment for about three weeks to the victim E, and the victim G (the victim 37 years old), which is the passenger of the said taxi, and the victim H (the victim Hah, the Hah 32 years old), respectively, by causing about two weeks of injury, such as dump, tension, etc.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) provided that the Defendant driven the above vehicle from the border of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the front road of the same Gu C at the time and time under paragraph (1) of the same Article. The Defendant, as the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, had a reasonable ground to recognize that the Defendant driven the vehicle under the influence of alcohol even when under the influence of alcohol, such as under the influence of alcohol, is inaccurate, by the J of the police station I district of Yeongdeungpo-gu, the Gyeongpo Police Station affiliated with the I district, and by making the Defendant snickly snick and snickly snick the Defendant.