beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.14 2012고단4442

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant at the office of heading C building 201 in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2006, stated that the facts charged, such as business plan, prop consent form, and balance certificate deposited in KRW 13 billion for business funds, include "written intent to participate in construction, written intent to participate in the Ef (PF)". However, according to the investigation records on the 37,38th page, the above documents are deemed to have been prepared on January 19, 207, and are not mentioned in the victim's statement at investigation agency (76 pages of investigation records) or the statement at this court. Thus, the facts charged are reduced and recognized.

It shows that there is a lack of funds for redevelopment projects of Pyeongtaek-si Eth House in Korea.

If 10% of the written consent of the props has been received at least 70%, work shall be completed.

When the land contract is completed, it is possible to obtain the PF loan, so that the loan of KRW 100 million will be made by attaching the profit of 10 times the principal to the loan of KRW 110 million.

The facts charged are as follows: “The business is conducted jointly with F, and the money will be transferred to F, a corporation account.”

“The Defendant deceivings the Defendant.”

in writing.

In this part, the statement of the victim is not available as evidence of deception.

However, the Defendant, K, and G did not promote the instant project together with F Co., Ltd. and the Defendant.

(2) The victim has been working in the same manner as the principal and branch when questioning the defendant's investigative agency;

K has already invested in F Co., Ltd., and if it is sent to the account, it will be possible to receive the defendant.

“The Defendant stated that he sent the money to the above account,” and the Defendant stated that he was jointly running the instant business with F Co., Ltd.

The fact that the victim did not make any statement at all, (30 to 31 of the investigation records), and the victim did not reach this court with F.