2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On July 12, 2017, the Plaintiff made a statement to the effect that he / she was taking meals to the Defendant after he/she scam in a “C” restaurant operated by the Defendant, which is located in Chuncheon-si, on the top of the trend in which he/she was supplied with a ccambling, etc., and that he/she was frighted to the Defendant. At that time, the Plaintiff did not show a fright to the

B. On July 29, 2017, the Plaintiff received a medical examination of the part of the first dental clinic located in Chuncheon-si, which was conducted by the dental clinic on the right side of the first dental clinic, and then found in the above restaurant operated by the Defendant and demanded the Plaintiff to pay KRW 35,000 of the medical expenses paid to the above dental clinic. The Defendant, while paying KRW 35,000 to the Plaintiff, provided that the Plaintiff was to leave the above dental clinic as the Plaintiff.

C. On August 19, 2017, the Plaintiff, working with the Defendant, filed the said dental clinic, and received a re-examination of the same father. At that time, exceptional points, such as dental damage, were not discovered, and the Defendant paid KRW 4,500 to the Plaintiff for medical expenses.

On August 26, 2017, the Plaintiff was treated as a cream on November 2017, after the Plaintiff laid down two hump values on the right side of the music at the E dental clinic located in Chuncheon-si.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 6, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On July 12, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that, on the part of the Defendant’s restaurant operated by Defendant, the Plaintiff was liable to compensate the Plaintiff for medical expenses, the sum of the expenses for Bobal and consolation money, and the damages incurred to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Plaintiff incurred losses, such as the Plaintiff’s scambling of 2 scambling on the right side of the music and the performance of the cambry operations, which caused the cambling of the cambal, and the damages incurred therefrom.

B. On July 12, 2017, the Defendant’s restaurant provided to the Plaintiff, even if the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff at the first instance trial and the evidence additionally submitted in the trial, was crypted by the crypted.