When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concluded a lease agreement with the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. at the business establishment of the vehicle C located in Young-gu, Young-gu; (b) and (c) embezzled the said vehicle as collateral by borrowing KRW 10 million to E around October 2014 while keeping the said vehicle in custody after receiving the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The application of counseling table, etc., automobile lease contract, automobile registration ledger, certified copy, etc. of the corporate registry, notification of termination of a contract, repayment order, deposit details, and inquiry into the history of consultation under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 355 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Since the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the sentencing guidelines do not apply to the recruitment of the workhouses.

Considering the fact that the victim's damage has not been fully recovered, that there is no agreement with the victim, that the defendant's mistake is recognized, that there is room for recovery of the damage due to the establishment of a mortgage on the motor vehicle embezzled by the defendant, and that there is no record of punishment for the same criminal offense.